µBlogging
Wednesday, 15 October 2008
For about two years now the concept of micro-blogging has been a serious idea in the internet world. Let me explain what it comes down to first.
There's a variety of websites that offer you the so called ability to 'micro-blog'. When you create an account you can send messages consisting of 140 characters to the service. A few examples are of those services are twitter, pownce and jaiku. So registration at one of those websites gets you a user page displaying your recent status updates. This way you can share what you're up to with the world. Say I'm listening to Maria Mena and totally enjoying it; I can visit twitter, log on and type:
Listening to Maria Mena and totally enjoying it!Then twitter will make sure it appears on my page. When you encourage your friends to register too they can also share their statuses with the world (including you). In this way you and your friends can stay informed about each others' lives.
Micro-blogging can also be used as a communication service, like a chatbox. For example my friend who is on twitter too reads that I'm listening to Maria Mena and replies:
@julius haha you like girly music!!Twitter makes sure I get to see the reply and, if I wish I can reply again. Like that it becomes a communication service.
What bugs me about this new trend of micro-blogging is that everyone with an internet connection can see what you're up to. (You have to make your updates public indeed, but that's done by default) so there are thousands of people out there everyone can check up on. It seems a little strange to me why there are a lot of people complaining about the level of privacy on the internet when, meanwhile, micro-blogging services are popping out of the ground like mushrooms.
But I'm not a privacy fanatic so let's take a look at the other end of the story.
What is the use of blogging, actually? Blogging enables people to share their thoughts, opinions, experiences, stories and photos with the world. Logically micro-blogging enables people to share the same things only on a different level. The micro level.
Imagine you really feel like sharing your opinion on something that is mainstream in the world today. Ah, presidential elections in the United States. You're a huge fan of Obama and want to convince the rest of the globe to become a fan too.
On a normal macro-blog you could write an entire analysis on Obama's spearpoints and give reasons why they're the best. But if you're a microblogger the result would probably be:
Yeahhhhhh! Obama FTW!mccain=nubc4k3!Okay that post would've been 36 characters so for the win could have been written fully. Still, this very sentence doesn't convince me of one's intellectual capacities, whereas a structured analysis would.
I'm not saying that the trend of micro-blogging is causing a social degeneration but it's certainly limiting the ability to give arguments for a statement.
But how useful is microblogging, really? Part of the user-base consists out of big media sources such as The Times. Those sources post summarized versions of their news in 140 characters to twitter (for example) and include a link to the original posting (consisting of more then 140 characters). So microblogging services can offer a way to stay up with the latest. Unfortunately for the microblogs this has been created years ago, with the realization of RSS (short for Really Simple Syndication). Using a so-called RSS-reader you can stay synchronized with all the blogs you follow.
In the end micro-blogging services seem an excuse not to talk to each other anymore. I mean, if my one of my friends did something cool in the weekend they will tell me on Monday morning, right? Read more...



